Tag Archives: Budget

How to Consolidate Your Business Debts

Just as consumers can find themselves in a burden of credit card debt due to misuse of their cards, business organizations can also come across such a situation due to various other reasons. When you’re residing in Canada and you have accumulated substantial amount of business debt, the reasons may be various. You may have either poorly managed your finances or been subject to sudden unexpected expenses. No matter what is the reason for the accumulation of debt, getting out of debt is always important lest this may hurt your personal financial records. Business debt management is in fact the most important task that you need to carry on while you’re the owner and if you can’t you should at least employ someone who will be entirely responsible for managing the finances of your firm.

What are the ways in which you can consolidate your business debts?

When you owe huge amount of business debt, you should educate yourself on the different ways in which you can eliminate this debt burden. There are some ways to do so and check them out.

  • Commercial credit counseling: Just as a consumer credit counselor helps you get back a grip on your finances by following a budget and the personal finance management techniques, the consumer credit counselor will also assist the business organization in getting back in shape. He will assess your present financial state so that he gets an idea about where you’re standing financially. He may craft a frugal budget for you so that you can follow it and bring your debts under control. If they see that your debt amount is beyond your capability to repay, they may sign you up with a debt management program and help you in getting out of debt through single and affordable monthly payments.
  • The debt consolidation loan: According to the Office of Consumer’s Affairs in Canada, the debtors has to calculate the total debt amount that he owes before meeting the loan officer who is supposed to give him the debt consolidation loan. Unless he knows the exact amount of debt that he owes, he can never take out the loan amount properly. You have to shop around in order to get a loan that best suits your needs and purposes.
  • Business debt settlement: When you feel that you don’t have enough funds in order to repay your debt obligations, you can opt for business debt settlement. A portion of debts will be forgiven by the lenders and you have to repay an amount that is much less than what you actually owe on your accounts.

Therefore, when you have incurred huge amounts of business debts, you need not worry as there are ways in which you can get out of the same. Choose the option that best suits your affordability so that you can make the timely payments on the loans and protect your credit score.

Posted in Guest Post | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Pros and Cons of Using a Credit Card to Finance Your Business

There have been plenty of success stories of people financing large ventures purely from plastic credit cards. Guitar Hero, Google, and Kevin Smith’s first movie “Clerks” are just a few. However, many more people have found themselves in bankruptcy court while also paired with an irreparable credit score. It can be very high risk, high reward, so you should be prepared before accumulating credit balances to start up your new business.

Advantages

  • Availability. Since the 2008 financial crisis, lenders have been backing off, making it even harder to find the capital to finance a startup. If you report a high enough income, you might just have a high enough limit to get your business going.
  • Take credit as you need it. Whereas you will likely be paying back the interest of a business loan before you are even able to spend it all, financing with credit cards allows you to only pay interest on the essential items you need to run your business.
  • Financial freedom. If using credit cards, you don’t have to justify every business expense to a consultant, investor, or shareholder. This might make the business process much less tedious.
  • Business rewards. This applies only if you have a business credit card, as opposed to a consumer card. Many business cards give nice cashback for office supplies and the like as well as frequent flyer rewards.
  • Simplifies tax issues. Again, this applies only to business credit cards. Having a separate credit card for your business purchases make filing taxes less of an issue. I wouldn’t advise financing a business with the same card you use for personal expenses.

Disadvantages

  • Availability of funds. While I mentioned earlier that credit cards may get you financing power where business loans were denied, you must also keep in mind that creditors have also seriously limited credit lines as well since the financial crisis. Unless you have an amazing credit history, you might not be able to get enough in credit cards to finance a business.
  • Sink or swim. When financing your business through credit cards, you are just about on your own. You will receive little oversight, and for many people, this could lead straight to a business failure. This is why it’s best to consult your business idea with many people before sacrificing your own debt, making the financial freedom advantage above somewhat moot.
  • Harsh consequences for failure. Failing any business is never a good thing, but failing a business primarily funded from credit cards is credit history murder. You will lose your savings, be under a huge pile of debt, and paying out interest for the rest of your life.
  • Limit cutoffs. It can often take time for a business venture to finally start bringing in capital, and there is a good chance that you may run up such a large balance on your card for a long enough time that your issuer will lower your credit limits. This could happen at a time where you need it the most.

Bottom Line

All things considered, financing a business primarily from credit cards should be avoided as much as possible. You should look for other methods of financing including loans, credit lines, or even peer-to-peer lending.

Ideally, business credit cards should be used as a means to pay unexpected business expenses like broken equipment, unexpected travel, and last-minute client dinners that might seriously impede your cash-flow. These are smaller business investments that would be easier to pay off over time than an entire start-up cost.

If you see no other alternative to finance your business, be incredibly meticulous. You will have to find a way to eventually pay these balances in addition to the interest they accrue. Having a detailed payment plan for your business credit cards (before you realize that you are having trouble paying them off) is a must. You must scrutinize how much you can afford to spend as well as form where and when your payment money will come.

This is a guest post by Eliza Morgan who is a full time blogger. She specializes in writing about business credit cards. You can reach her at elizamorgan856@gmail.com.

Posted in Guest Post | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Government Spending Habits and Excessive Taxing

An overtaxed society can create a deficient economy when the populous is burdened with the extra expenses of excessive tax. Funds used here can be used on a more productive level or a healthier happier lifestyle. The journey from which the sum of $200 takes from pay check to the last penny is likely taxed in more ways than we realize and below is compromising example.

To begin with, let’s remove the 20% income tax leaving $160.00

From there, a modest 3% for old age pension contribution leaving $152.00 Next, a modest 2% for EI contribution which leaves $148.96 Then of course for the benefit of this example non-food purchases are made from the remaining $148.96 which of course are taxed a further 14% leaving an actual spending net of $128.10 from the original $200. Calculate this example over a year’s time and the average citizen could dish out close to $1,000 in taxes just on this $200 monthly allowance. And this is not inclusive with home expenses, heating, vehicle, gas, clothing, gifts etc.

Additionally upon retirement our little nest egg is taxed once again. Not only does this compound the original taxes taken years prior from the original $200, taxes 30 years later are far higher. Now, if we the people can find ways to adapt our living habits and by force mind you to accommodate this excessive taxing and/or create ways to generate additional income, then why is it so difficult for government to apply the same effort?

Each year the same questions arise within government. How can they raise more money? How can they pay for this service or that project? Yet, each time the answers fall under the same category or are mentioned on their list of solutions; tax the people. A simple and effortless solution is often considered ideal when the labouring efforts of others are involved isn’t it?

Alternative yet Simple Methods

An ideal start might be to revamp the way government and its branching departments spend our tax dollars in the first place. Needless expensive ad campaigns, excessive monthly allowable budgets inclusive with expensive dinner engagements, gas allowance, private travel etc. Do they really need to have that $200 meal? Is that really necessary when lower income earners foot the bill?

With a prosperous income to begin with why is there a need to use income from the people for their extravagant business trips and dinners? An ideal way to re-direct this money back to the people would be to account for it themselves and apply them as business expenses when filing taxes like the rest of the population.

There are far too many small government offices and positions branched out into too many different departments. An example: a simple phone call to any municipality and the prompts are endless as to which department you seek. Multi-tasking within these positions would definitely generate money.

Reason being, the regular job market which is another disturbing problem has developed into a endless array of multi-tasking jobs but are all categorized under one single job description. Yet, our wages are based on a pay scale which is outdated and almost pathetic.

If we the people can adapt to the demanding needs of a competitive job market saturated with multi-tasking jobs, then the thousands of needless departments within government can apply these same methods. This is how companies in Canada survive. This is how government can re-modify their labour costs using the savings to benefit in needed areas that seem to arise year after year.

Government needs to address these issues as it’s becoming more difficult to acquire simple jobs and simple housing for the average citizen who can’t afford post secondary education. How does one acquire experience when companies large and small refuse to train even for the simplest positions?

Today’s society and government is far too demanding, far too selfish focusing more on profits gained from citizens with the perfect credit rating, the healthy bank account and that over qualified resume.

Focusing on the whole picture here, a little leniency, human compassion and an overall team effort can go a long way when creating a healthy economy and a balanced government.

Author: Kellie Hastings

Researcher and writer of articles pertaining to health, anti-aging, pollution, and public/health awareness. For health concerns on GE Foods, Cloned animal foods, GE Food Watch List, Diseased Factory Farms- videos and FDA corruption visit [http://www.discovery-health.org]

US Dollar credit card

Posted in Guest Post | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Does Canada Revenue Agency Think You Are Self-Employed?

With the economy going the way it is practically everyone is becoming self-employed these days. According to Industry Canada’s Small Business Quarterly, the number of self-employment workers increased by 40,000 to 2.633 million from 2008 to 2009, an increase of 1.5 percent. But are you really self-employed? Yes, of course the guy who is paying you tells you, ‘its ok, you are self-employed’. He calls you a contractor and even has you sign a contract but does CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) think you are self-employed. It is an important question to ask yourself because you may end up being reassessed on the basis of your employment status. This would mean some or all of your deduction may be disallowed by CRA.

Employment status directly affects your entitlement to EI (Employment Insurance) and CPP (Canada Pension Plan). If you are an employee, the payer is considered an employer. Employers are responsible for deducting CPP contributions, EI premiums, and income tax from amounts they pay to their employees. They have to remit these deductions along with their share of CPP contributions and EI premiums.

Certain factors have to be considered when determining if you are an employee or self-employed individual. In all provinces or territories except Quebec, the following determine your employment status. When examining whether or not you are an employee or self-employed individual, the key question is whether or not your were engaged to perform services as a person in business on your own account, or as an employee.

The intent of you and the payer when you both entered into the working arrangement is very important. Did the two parties (you and the payer) intend to enter into a contract of service (employer-employee relationship) or did they intend to enter into a contract for services (business relationship)? The best way to show clear intent is to have a written agreement- the terms and conditions of the work to be performed. Note: In a written contract, the parties may state that in the event of a disagreement regarding the contents of the contract, it is to be interpreted under the Quebec law (Civil Code), even though the contract was formed for example in Ontario (Common Law).

Aside from the contract, you have to answer the following questions and if possible answer them in the contract. CRA uses these same questions to determine whether or not a business relationship existed.

What level of control the payer has over the worker

Control is the ability, authority, or right of a payer to exercise control over a worker concerning the manner in which the work is done and what work will be done. If the payer exercises a high level of control (especially on the worker’s daily activities) then an employer-employee relationship may exist. Some of the indicators that the worker is an employee are; the relationship is one of subordination; the payer controls the worker with respect to both the results of the work and the method used to do the work; the payer determines and controls the method and amount of pay; the worker requires permission to work for other payers while working for this payer; the payer determines what jobs the worker will do; the worker receives training or direction from the payer on how to do the work; and the payer chooses to listen to the worker’s suggestions but has the final word. Some of the indicators that the worker is a self-employed individual are; worker usually work independently within a defined framework; does not have anyone overseeing them; free to work when and for whom he or she chooses and may provide his or her services to different payers at the same time; can accept or refuse work from the payer; and the relationship between the payer and the worker does not present a degree of continuity, loyalty, security, subordination, or integration.

Did the worker provide the tools and equipment used?

If you own and provide tools and equipment to accomplish the work or have contractual control of and responsibility for, an asset in a rental or lease situation.

Can the worker subcontract the works or hire assistants?

If you have to perform the services personally and can not send a replacement then you are an employee. So the payer has no say in whom the worker hires.

What degree of financial risk taken by the worker?

If you made a significant investment in the tools and equipment along with the cost of replacement, repair, and insurance may place you at a risk of loss. There must not be any reimbursement by the payer for use of these tools and equipments supplied by the worker. With a risk of loss, you are taking high degree of financial risk.

What degree of responsibility for investment and management held by worker?

You had to invest capital to in order to get the contract. You manage your staff- you hire and pay individuals to help perform the work.

Is there an opportunity for profit by the worker?

You can realize a profit or incur a loss, as this indicates you control the business aspects of services rendered and that a business relationship likely exists.

Let’s look at the above statements from a cash-flow prospective. For example, if John Doe is the employee above and makes $19.31 per hour. His latest paycheck has the following information:

Gross Earnings $1057.22

CPP ($ 46.24)

EI ($ 18.32)

FED Tax ($ 120.38)

Take Home $ 872.28

Now if John Doe was self-employed then this is what his cash-flow would look like:

Gross Earnings $1057.22

Fed Tax ($ 120.38)

Take Home $ 936.84

There is a definite advantage to being self-employed over being employed from a cash-flow perspective. The disadvantage is you have to create your own retirement plan (CPP) and a cushion (EI) in the event of a slowdown or shut-off of revenue.

I believe that it is very important that everyone learn to manage and grow their money in as many ways as possible. I believe the key to do this is found through increasing one’s financial intelligence.

Author: Colin B Wallace
Article Source: EzineArticles.com

Posted in Guest Post | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New Payroll Services

As an added value to our clients, Better Tax Services has decided to partner with NEBS PAYweb.ca for all your payroll needs.

Why Choose NEBS PAYweb.ca for your Payroll Services?

  • Established in 1967, NEBS PAYweb.ca is Canada’s longest serving and most trusted payroll specialist allowing us to excel in customer satisfaction and customer support. PAYweb has been trusted by Canadian companies from coast-to-coast for over 40 years. Their clients range in size from 1 employee to 1000 employees. They can accommodate businesses with employees across Canada.
  • View the NEBS PAYweb.ca flash presentation for an overview. 

NEBS PAYweb.ca is a perfect payroll solution to:

  • Reduce cost
  • Increase efficiency
  • Ensure compliance
  • Increase accuracy
  • Increase accessibility

NEBS PAYweb.ca Payroll Services offers:

  • Online inputs
  • Real time calculation
  • Remote printing – Reports & Stubs
  • e-Stubs
  • Unlimited Accruals
  • Customer Satisfaction

Find out how much money you can save a month! Get a free, no obligation quote and let NEBS PAYweb.ca become your payroll experts!

Patrice Edouard
Payroll Specialist
1-877-461-5006 Ext 2472
pedouard@nebs.com

*Ask Patrice about his special offers and don’t forget to mention that you’ve been referred by Better Tax Services!

Posted in Small Business | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Cost of Canada’s Constitutional Monarchy

There is a lot of media hype surrounding the upcoming marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton in the British Royal Family. Many people are looking forward to what dress Kate will be wearing, how the ceremony and celebration will play out and who will end up attending the wedding. Reports state that an estimated audience of two billion people will tune into the wedding on the morning of April 29, 2011.

With all this attention surrounding the Royal Family, Canadians are beginning to wonder if we are paying for any of this. I did some research and found a very interesting report from the The Monarchist League of Canada dated from July 2009.

SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Canada’s Royal Family and Vice-Regal officeholders together undertake significantly more than 4,000 engagements a year.
  • The report calculates that the total cost of the Canadian Crown in 2007 was $50,146,896 or $1.53 per Canadian.
  • The Monarchy costs residents of the United Kingdom (a unitary state of compact size) a total of £38 million in 2007 ($76.7 million, or $1.26 per person).
  • By way of comparison, the Canadian Monarchy costs Canadians less than the Senate ($2.45 per person), about the same as the National Gallery of Canada ($1.43 per person) and a little more than the Library of Parliament ($1.02 per person).
  • The same accounts indicate that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation cost Canadians $1,114,053,000 ($33/Canadian).
  • The current Civil List for the Belgian Monarchy is €13.8 million ($22.6 million) or $2.18 per Belgian resident. The 2007 budget accorded the Spanish Royal House by the Cortes was €8.66 million ($14.4 million) or $.35 per Spanish resident.

Overall, the cost of Canada’s Sovereign and eleven Governors is comparable to the monarchies of other Western nations. 

Source: The Cost of Canada’s Constitutional Monarchy

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Funny! A Day in the Life of a Financial Advisor

The week has just started and tax season is in full swing. Here is a video to help brighten up your day!

Tax planning and financial planning are two main topics leading to your overall financial success. Enjoy the funny video… It’s hilarious!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

What is the Quebec Solidarity Tax Credit?

As announced in the March 2010 Provincial Budget, the Solidarity Tax Credit replaced the following:

  • QST credit
  • Property tax refund
  • Tax credit for individuals living in a northern village

To claim the solidarity tax credit, an individual must:

  • Be 18 or over
  • Be resident of Québec
  • Have legal status (Canadian citizen, permanent resident, refugee, etc.)
  • Not be confined to a prison or similar institution

Only one solidarity tax credit claim can be made per couple. To receive the tax credit payments, individuals must be registered for direct deposit. Individuals who are not already registered for direct deposit can register online using the Register for Direct Deposit service or submit their request for direct deposit along with their 2010 Personal Income Tax filing.

Payments for this new refundable tax credit will be paid once a month.

Posted in Tax Tips | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

2011 Brings Many Tax Increases

Make sure to count all your pennies because you are going to need them!

As of January 1, 2011 there have been a broad range of tax increases for all Quebecers and those individuals who live on the island of Montreal. Below is a list of all increases:

  • The Provincial sales tax rate (QST) increased to 8.5%. The combined GST/QST rate stands at 13.925%
  • QPP contributions will be calculated on the first $48,300 of earnings in 2011, up from $47,200 in 2010, so that the maximum payable by Quebecers will rise to $2,217.60 from $2,163.15 in 2010.
  • For the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan, the earnings threshold rises to $64,000 from $62,500 and the employee contribution rate increases to 0.537% from 0.506%, boosting the maximum payable to $343.68 from $316.25 in 2010.
  • Employment Insurance dues will be calculated at 1.41% on the first $44,200 of income, up from 1.36% on the first $43,200 in 2010, raising the maximum annual cost to $623.22, up from $587.52 in 2010.
  • The Quebec prescription drug insurance plan, also had its maximum annual premium increased to $600 from $585, though Quebecers who use the plan won’t face that cost until they file their provincial income-tax returns in early 2012.
  • A new provincial health contribution was announced in the last Quebec budget: $25 for all tax filers on 2010 returns, $100 in 2011 and $200 in 2012.
  • Individuals living on the island of Montreal will be subject to a new “car tax” which will be capped at $50 per vehicle owned. This new tax will be collected at the time of payment of the vehicle registration.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Quebec Drops its Proposed Health Care User Fees

Last month, Quebec Finance Minister Raymond Bachand gave up the idea of charging user fees every time a patient sees a doctor and is instead searching for new revenues to finance Quebec’s health care system. Bachand had described the $25 user fee as a deductible for the doctor visit and it would be assessed when the individual pays their income tax the following year.

The user fees were expected to raise an additional $500 million per year in extra revenues.

Doctors and nurses associations said the charge would discourage people from seeing a doctor. Other party leaders opposed the idea as well saying that both the rich and poor would be paying the same amount for each visit.

Although user fees may have been abolished for now, don’t forget about the new “Health Contribution”. Quebecers are now paying a $25 “Health Contribution” this year, rising to $100 next year and then $200 in 2012.

The real solution to Quebec’s health care woes is to make people responsible for a portion of the health care services they use, and the principle behind a user fee does just that. The fee would help individuals to make reasonable choices when using medical services and provide more incentive to choose healthier lifestyles.

Raising taxes with a new “Health Contribution”, provides no incentive and does not solve the underlying problem with the health care system.

Last month, Quebec Finance Minister Raymond Bachand gave up the idea of charging user fees every time a patient sees a doctor and is instead searching for new revenues to finance Quebec’s health care system. Bachand had described the $25 user fee as a deductible for the doctor visit and it would be assessed when the individual pays their income tax the following year.

The user fees were expected to raise an additional $500 million per year in extra revenues.

Doctors and nurses associations said the charge would discourage people from seeing a doctor. Other party leaders opposed the idea as well saying that both the rich and poor would be paying the same amount for each visit.

Although user fees may have been abolished for now, don’t forget about the new “Health Contribution”. Quebecers are now paying a $25 “Health Contribution” this year, rising to $100 next year and then $200 in 2012.

The real solution to Quebec’s health care woes is to make people responsible for a portion of the health care services they use, and the principle behind a user fee does just that. The fee would help individuals to make reasonable choices when using medical services and provide more incentive to choose healthier lifestyles.

Raising taxes with a new “Health Contribution”, provides no incentive and does not solve the underlying problem with the healthcare system.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment